Experience Rating Plan

A core pricing mechanism that promotes fairness, accountability, and data-driven decision-making 

The Experience Rating Plan is a mandatory, actuarially sound methodology that adjusts workers’ compensation premiums based on an employer’s individual loss experience relative to similarly classified employers. By directly linking pricing to historical performance, the plan rewards effective safety and claims management while ensuring risks with higher-than-expected losses are priced appropriately.  

dcrb-404-min (1)

Supporting Systemwide Fairness & Stability

DCRB administers Delaware’s Experience Rating Plan using approved formulas, validated data, and uniform standards. This ensures experience modifications are calculated consistently and transparently, providing members with confidence in the accuracy of premium adjustments and supporting a fair, equitable workers’ compensation system statewide. 

By maintaining a transparent and consistently applied Experience Rating Plan, DCRB helps ensure:

  • Premiums accurately reflect individual risk performance 
  • Employers are incentivized to invest in safety and loss control 
  • Carriers can price policies responsibly and consistently 
  • Regulators can rely on objective, data-driven standards

This structured approach reinforces confidence in Delaware’s workers’ compensation system and supports long-term market stability. 

Update Effective December 1, 2024

DCRB updated the Delaware Experience Rating Plan effective April 1, 2024. These changes were intended to preserve actuarial integrity, enhance clarity, and ensure the plan continues to function as a reliable and equitable pricing tool for all qualifying risks. 

Members should review resources available on this page to understand what is changing, how the updates affect experience modifications, and what actions—if any—may be needed. 

Experience Modification Calculator

Estimate experience modification factors and compare results between the current and updated plans.

Experience Rating Plan Pamphlet

Plain-language overview of experience rating principles and the 2024 plan updates

Experience Rating Plan Fact Sheet

Plan comparisons, key terminology, and glossary supporting interpretation of the 2024 mod worksheet.

FAQs

The goal of the research was to enhance plan performance through improved predictive accuracy that incentivizes workplace safety. The current Experience Rating Plan (ERP) has been used for more than two decades. Research identified opportunities to improve the current plan and to improve the cohesiveness between the Merit Rating and Experience Rating Plans.

No. While other formulas and approaches were analyzed, it was determined that the current formula could be sufficiently optimized to achieve the target performance metrics. Also, some of the formulas in other states were comparable to the DE formula as credibility levels approach 100%. The current formula is [Ap x C + E x C x L + E(1.000 – C)] / E, where Ap = Actual Primary Loss, E = Expected Loss, C = Credibility, and L = Limitation Charge.

  • Eligibility requirement: The minimum premium requirement is being reduced to $5,000 over the three-year experience period from a single-year annual amount of $3,161. The premium requirement is based on premium developed by the audited payrolls or other exposures of the experience period, extended at current DCRB Residual Market Rates. The premium requirement for merit rating will be for risks that generate less than $5,000 on the same basis as stated above.
  • Split point/loss limit: The plan runs on variable split points based on expected loss amounts ranging from $10,000 to $300,000. This is different from the current plan, which ranges from $30,405 to $553,000.
  • Credibility values: With the change to variable split points, credibility was increased, especially for the smaller risks ranging in value from 69% to 97%.
  • Capping rules: A maximum modification formula will be used with a starting value of 1.10 and increase as a function of expected losses as follows:
  • Max Mod = 1.10 + 0.0004 (E/G), Where E = Expected Loss, G = 12

By introducing a maximum modification formula and reducing the eligibility level, this will result in a better transition for risks that move between the Merit and Experience Rating Plans. It also limits debit modifications for the smaller more volatile risks compared to the current plan. Also, the plan maintained the variable split point approach as this improves stability and allows for the application of higher credibility values on the actual primary losses to improve performance across all risk sizes. Lastly, introduction of the max mod formula ensures a reasonable level of stability for year-to-year changes.

As with any new plan, this question is difficult to answer as there will be modifications that don’t change very much (between +/-10%), some that go up by more than 10%, and some that go down by more than -10%.

The current variable split point plan has performed relatively well, however our recent research and research performed in other states, including Pennsylvania, supports that this type of plan, when coupled with higher levels of credibility, tends to yield better performance.

A Modification Calculator Tool will be published on our website in the coming weeks, allowing users to enter exposure and loss data and show how their mod will change under the new plan.

The maximum modification formula increases with higher expected losses. If the indicated modification is higher than the maximum modification, then the final published modification will be the maximum modification.

For the risks that are currently merit rated, risks getting a merit mod of 0.95 will generally see a lower credit mod and for risks that are getting a 1.05 debit mod will generally see a larger debit, however they might be subject to the maximum modification. Due to the maximum modification formula, risks with expected losses of $25,000 or less will no longer have modifications above 1.93.

The minimum premium requirement is being reduced to $5,000 over a three-year experience period from single-year annual amount of $3,161. The premium requirement is based on premium developed by the audited payrolls or other exposures of the experience period, extended at current DCRB Residual Market Rates. Risks that do not qualify for experience rating will be considered for the Merit rating program.

The new ERP was designed to perform better for both larger and smaller risks. The Merit rating plan is a very basic plan intended for only the smallest of risks. Testing on risks between $5,000 and $10,000 showed that the new ERP performed well. In addition to performance, a lower eligibility threshold in conjunction with the use of maximum modifications allows for a better transition between the Merit and Experience Rating Plans for the smaller risks. Due to statutory limitation, the Merit Rating Plan could not be eliminated entirely. Even with the lower eligibility amount, 62% of the statewide risks would remain merit-rated.

Small risks that now meet the lower $5,000 ERP eligibility threshold will get an experience rating factor instead of a merit rating factor.

Yes, a new modification worksheet is coming. The format will be updated to improve readability and align more closely with practices in other states. New information will be added such as a listing of all individual losses rather than only the losses that were above the spit point/loss limit and a modification status to show if the modification has been revised.

A Glossary of Terms in the Fact Sheet can be found within the ERP section of the DCRB website, www.dcrb.com, with definitions of all terminology found on the worksheet.

For a 2-year period, (April 1, 2024- March 31, 2026) the current capping rules would apply in addition to the use of the new Maximum Modification formula. The current capping rules utilize both +/-25% swing limits and a secondary capping rule (a rule that produces a mod of 1.0 in cases where the current mod is a debit mod, above 1.0, but the indicated mod is a credit mod below 1.00 and the -25% swing limit capped mod would still results in a mod above 1.0.

The 2-year transition period capping will no longer apply for mods effective April 1, 2026.

After the 2-year transition period, only the new capping rules apply (maximum modification and +40% swing) and the +/-25% swing limits and the secondary capping rule no longer applies.

Yes. When the updated ERP is filed with a target effective date of 12/1/2024, the corresponding loss costs filed for 12/1/2024 will be adjusted (off balanced) to make the ERP changes revenue neutral. For example, if the updated ERP plan results in average experience modification factors that reduced premiums by 2%, then the average loss costs will need to increase by 2% to achieve no overall change in premium due to the implementation in the updated plan. If it is assumed that the overall loss cost indication change was -6% in this example, then the final filed overall change to loss costs with the implementation of the updated ERP would be roughly -4% (-6% plus the 2% off-balance).

No. With the approval of DCRB Filing No. 2103, ratable losses that enter the plan formula will be reduced by the subrogated amounts and then limited by the split point if applicable.

Yes. SB-306 amended § 2379 of the Workers’ Compensation Act with changes to the Delaware Workplace Safety Program. This was considered a “cleanup” or “technical” bill with changes designed to better align the program with contemporary standards that enhance its effectiveness in promoting workplace safety. Previously, the program specified an annual premium threshold of $3,161 for eligibility. The revised language no longer includes this specific amount, focusing instead on qualifying through the uniform ERP. This provides coordination and flexibility for future adjustments without needing additional legislative changes. The updated eligibility will also allow additional small employers to consider joining the workplace safety program. Additionally, the Workplace Safety program utilizes credibility values from the ERP.